Wednesday, October 21, 2009 - Now it's Beaverton that's being asked for a large public subsidy for Portland's baseball
Beavers. KINK Considers the only way this deal should get to first base.
The Portland Beavers would become the Beaverton Beavers if owner Merritt Paulson
gets a requested public subsidy for a new minor league baseball stadium in Beaverton.
The stadium would cost 59-million-dollars although that's well, a ballpark estimate, since
no site has been decided on yet. Paulson would put up nine million, the City of
Beaverton would put up 35 million from an increase in property taxes and utility fees
that would average sixty dollars a year, and a ticket tax would cover the rest.
A local group opposing the effort questions whether this is the best investment of
public funds. It's not really economic development. It's what's called the substitution
effect. Instead of going ice-skating or to a movie on a Friday night, you might go to
the ballpark. Entertainment dollars just get moved around. Public funding of the
ballpark would mostly be a public subsidy for a private business that would create no
new permanent jobs in the Portland area. The jobs would just be transferred from
Portland to Beaverton.
Now it's true that if the 86-hundred seat stadium is built it could host some
community activities. But bear in mind that this would be an outdoor venue and the
Beavers would take up much of prime time. So what to do? The opposition is
planning to gather signatures and put the issue on the ballot. We think the City should
schedule an election without a signature-gathering effort and here's why: Beaverton's
city charter calls for a public vote on any proposed urban renewal project that makes
use of a certain kind of financing--tax increment financing. While this project does
not use that kind of financing it would have a dedicated source of public funding and
it is urban renewal. So in the spirit of the City of Beaverton city charter, it should be
put on the ballot.